滕彪文集
[主页]->[独立中文笔会]->[滕彪文集]->[Columbia U. cancels panel on Communist China’s human rights violation]
滕彪文集
·Beijing Suspends Licenses of 2 Lawyers Who Offered to Defend Tibetans in Court
·National Endowment for Democracy 2008 Democracy Awards
·获奖感言
·司法与民意——镜城突围
·Rewards and risks of a career in the legal system
·太离谱的现实感
·35个网评员对“这鸡蛋真难吃”的不同回答(转载加编辑加原创)
·Dissonance Strikes A Chord
·顺应历史潮流 实现律协直选——致全体北京律师、市司法局、市律协的呼吁
·但愿程序正义从杨佳案开始/滕彪 许志永
·维权的计算及其他
·我们对北京律协“严正声明”的回应
·网络言论自由讨论会会议纪要(上)
·网络言论自由讨论会会议纪要(下)
·Well-Known Human Rights Advocate Teng Biao Is Not Afraid
·法眼冷对三鹿门
·北京律师为自己维权风暴/亚洲周刊
·胡佳若获诺贝尔奖将推动中国人权/voa
·奥运后的中国人权
·Chinese Activist Wins Rights Prize
·我无法放弃——记一次“绑架”
·认真对待出国权
·毒奶粉:谁的危机?
·不要制造聂树斌——甘锦华抢劫案的当庭辩护词
·“独立知识分子”滕彪/刘溜
·经济观察报专访/滕彪:让我们不再恐惧
·人权:从理念到制度——纪念《世界人权宣言》60周年
·公民月刊:每一个人都可能是历史的转折点
·抵制央视、拒绝洗脑
·公民在行动
·Charter of Democracy
·阳光茅老
·中国“黑监狱”情况让人担忧/路透社
·《关于取缔黑监狱的建议》
·用法律武器保护家园——青岛市河西村民拆迁诉讼代理词
·关于改革看守所体制及审前羁押制度的公民建议书
·仅仅因为他们说了真话
·再审甘锦华 生死仍成谜
·邓玉娇是不是“女杨佳”?
·星星——为六四而作
·I Cannot Give Up: Record of a "Kidnapping"
·Political Legitimacy and Charter 08
·六四短信
·倡议“5•10”作为“公民正当防卫日”
·谁是敌人——回"新浪网友"
·为逯军喝彩
·赠晓波
·正义的运动场——邓玉娇案二人谈
·这六年,公盟做了什么?
·公盟不死
·我们不怕/Elena Milashina
·The Law On Trial In China
·自由有多重要,翻墙就有多重要
·你也会被警察带走吗
·Lawyer’s Detention Shakes China’s Rights Movement
·我来推推推
·许志永年表
·庄璐小妹妹快回家吧
·开江县法院随意剥夺公民的辩护权
·Summary Biography of Xu Zhiyong
·三著名行政法学家关于“公盟取缔事件”法律意见书
·公益诉讼“抑郁症”/《中国新闻周刊》
·在中石化上访
·《零八宪章》与政治正当性问题
·我来推推推(之二)
·我来推推推(之三)
·國慶有感
·我来推推推(之四)
·国庆的故事(系列之一)
·国庆的故事(系列之二)
·
·我来推推推(之五)
·我来推推推(之六)
·净空(小说)
·作为反抗的记忆——《不虚此行——北京劳教调遣处纪实》序
·twitter直播-承德冤案申诉行动
·我来推推推(之七)
·关于我的证言的证言
·我来推推推(之八)
·不只是问问而已
·甘锦华再判死刑 紧急公开信呼吁慎重
·就甘锦华案致最高人民法院死刑复核法官的紧急公开信
·我来推推推(之九)
·DON’T BE EVIL
·我来推推推(之十)
·景德镇监狱三名死刑犯绝食吁国际关注
·江西乐平死刑冤案-向最高人民检察院的申诉材料
·我来推推推(之十一)
·法律人的尊严在于独立
·我来推推推(之十二)
·听从正义和良知的呼唤——在北京市司法局关于吊销唐吉田、刘巍律师证的听证会上的代理意见
·一个思想实验:关于中国政治
·公民维权与社会转型(上)——在北京传知行社会经济研究所的演讲
·公民维权与社会转型——在北京传知行社会经济研究所的演讲(下)
·福州“7•4”奇遇记
·夏俊峰案二审辩护词(新版)
·摄录机打破官方垄断
·敦请最高人民检察院立即对重庆打黑运动中的刑讯逼供问题依法调查的公开信
·为政治文明及格线而奋斗——滕彪律师的维权之路
·“打死挖个坑埋了!”
·"A Hole to Bury You"
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Columbia U. cancels panel on Communist China’s human rights violation

   https://www.thecollegefix.com/columbia-u-cancels-panel-on-communist-chinas-human-rights-violations/
   
   Columbia U. cancels panel on Communist China’s human rights violations
   
   JEREMIAH POFF - STAFF REPORTER •NOVEMBER 20, 2019


   SHARE THIS ARTICLE: The College Fix on Facebook The College Fix on Twitter The College Fix on Youtube Share on Email
   
   UPDATED
   
   Pro-Chinese student group reportedly threatened the Ivy League school
   
   A prominent Chinese human rights attorney and scholar announced Friday that a planned panel on human rights violations by the Chinese Communist party had been canceled, pointing to pressure by pro-Chinese students as the cause.
   
   Teng Biao made the announcement on Twitter Friday that the event that had been planned for the day before had been canceled hours before it was supposed to take place, saying a Chinese student group had threatened the Ivy League school.
   
   The planned panel, “Panopticism with Chinese Characteristics: Human Rights Violations by the Chinese Communist Party and How They Affect the World,” was slated to include lawyer Biao, Tiananmen Square massacre survivor Rose Tang, exiled Tibetan Dorjee Tseten, Hong Kong activist Roxanne Chang, and Rushan Abbas, the executive director of Campaign for Uyghurs.
   
   
   滕彪
   ✔
   @tengbiao
    [Thread] A Chinese student group, likely CSSA, threatened Columbia University to cancel a panel discussion on #humanrights in #hongkong #tibet #EastTurkestan #Uyghurs and #China. And they successfully blocked the discussion. An extreme insult to free speech in this country.
   
   2,094
   6:12 PM - Nov 15, 2019
   Twitter Ads info and privacy
   1,843 people are talking about this
   All of them are critics of the Chinese Communist party.
   
   The panelists issued a joint statement blasting pro-communist party Chinese students across the country for “incidents of blatant vandalism, hate speech and physical assaults,” saying that this was only the latest example.
   
   “We were shocked that our event became the latest casualty of a worrying trend in which organized groups of pro-Beijing Chinese students in American universities vandalize posters, threaten, intimidate and harass students, staff and even guest speakers on and off campus—whoever they do not like or do not agree with, including Chinese students,” the joint statement reads.
   
   In his Twitter thread, Biao revealed that pro-democracy Chinese students had told him that students in Chinese Students and Scholars Association, a student group with chapters at numerous colleges and funded by the Chinese government, report to Chinese consulates any time there is a campus event critical of the Beijing government. Consulate officials then counsel students on what they should do.
   
   The Columbia Spectator reported that the event was in fact canceled due to a failure to follow the proper channels to book an event, something that is not mentioned at all in Biao’s twitter thread or the panelists’ statement.
   
   The Spectator quoted a university spokesperson who said that once proper procedures are followed, the panel may be rescheduled.
   
   Columbia was actually the second planned location of the event, after plans to hold it at NYU’s Kraft Center for Jewish Student Life fell through for similar booking situations, the Spectator reported.
   
   “We’re extremely concerned that American universities, safe havens that welcome all from around the world, beacons of freedom, independence and truth, have become battle fields and fallen victim to the dictatorship that is the Chinese government,” the panelists’ statement said.
   
   “The clashes in universities have been instigated mainly by two organizations, the Confucius Institute, an arm of China’s Education Ministry, and the Chinese Students and Scholars Association, which has chapters on nearly every American university campus and is financed and sponsored by the Chinese Embassy and consulates.”
   
   The panelists said it was “shocking” that the Chinese Communist party “has been allowed to wield its power over American educational institutions where academic freedoms and freedom of speech are protected and promoted.”
   
   “As dissidents persecuted by Beijing,” they continued, “we’re dismayed that we now have to defend our freedoms in our country—the United States of America.”
   
   Calling the cancellation an “insult to academic freedom, free speech and the whole educational sector in this country,” the panelists said that it was “important” for American students to learn about the Chinese government’s actions towards Hong Kong, East Turkestan, Tibet, and Southern Mongolia, but “the Chinese government’s long arm has repeatedly prevented such discussions from happening.”
   
   “We’re deeply disturbed to witness this unfortunate incident at a prestigious university like Columbia University,” the panelists said. “It’s a sign of how deeply the Chinese government has infiltrated our academic institutions and exert influence. We believe students have the right to an education free from the Chinese government’s influence and an environment free from China’s censorship efforts.”
   
   The would-be panelists called on colleges across the country to shut down Chinese Student and Scholar Associations, along with the academic Confucius Institutes that have also faced criticism for their ties to the Chinese government.
   
   They also called on Congress to “host hearings and conduct investigations on the Chinese Communist Party’s infiltration, intimidation and encroachment of academic freedom and freedom of speech in American universities and schools.”
   
   Columbia, Teng Biao, and the Chinese embassy did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The College Fix.
   
   UPDATE:
   
   In a statement to The College Fix, Columbia reiterated that the only reason the panel did not take place was “basic steps to reserve a room at Columbia were not followed.”
   
   “The event organizers’ original plan was for the event to be held at NYU,” the statement said. “The subsequent effort to quickly move their event to Columbia failed to meet basic procedural steps required of every student group—a mundane reason, but the true one. Should Columbia’s chapter of Amnesty International want to reschedule the event, the proposed panel discussion will be welcomed at Columbia once the required procedures are met.”
   
   In a text message late Wednesday, Biao acknowledged that the student group had made “procedural mistakes when applying for a venue,” but added “it is also true that CSSA made the threat. The problem is the student who has the evidence is not willing to share the messages and email exchanges for understandable reasons.”
   
   Not elaborating on those “understandable reasons,” the human rights attorney made clear that he believes that “CSSA’s threat to free speech on American campuses should be paid more attention.”
(2019/11/23 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场