滕彪文集
[主页]->[独立中文笔会]->[滕彪文集]->[Innocence project movement in China rises to aid the wrongfully convic]
滕彪文集
·China faces split into seven parts
· A Call for Investigation Into HNA Group’s Activities in the US and L
·王全璋律师竞逐郁金香人权奖:无畏强权 勇气与付出
·〝维稳〞维到联合国?人权观察批中共
·City of Asylum -Interview
·对中共的绥靖政策已致恶果浮现
·China’s top human rights lawyer in exile to speak at Saint Michael’s
·Activist expats raise voices on China rights crackdown
·A Human Rights Lawyer Lifts the Communist Party’s Spell
·Returning to Revolution
·One-man rule? China's Xi Jinping consolidates grip on power
·劉曉波對維權律師的關注
·滕彪:中国自由民权运动与习近平时代
·Kidnap, torture, exile: Dr. Teng Biao shares his story
·維權、佔中與公民抗命
·Arrested, Assaulted and Tortured: Exiled Human Rights Lawyer Details P
·滕彪律师评论郭文贵事件的意义
·Coercive Family Planning in Linyi
·Chinese lawyers hailed as “heroes for justice”
·THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF THE DISAPPEARED
·《失踪人民共和国》
·EXEMPLARY FIGURES REPORTED BY GARIWO
·在劫难逃
·李明哲案 滕彪:陸意圖影響台灣政治籌碼
·人权律师解密北京的"水晶之夜"
·李明哲案:臺灣退無可退
·作为人类精神事件的刘晓波之死
·北京驱逐"低端"人口的制度根源
·Atrocity in the Name of the Law
·学者解析中共执政密码
·暴行,以法律的名义
·人道中国十周年纪录短片
·“中华维权律师协会”评出十佳维权律师
·中国妇权成立十周年纪念
·武统狂言背后的恐懼
·以法律名義被消失,中華失踪人民共和國
·川普公布首批人权恶棍 滕彪:震慑中共
·「蚂蚁金服」在美并购遭拒 中国官媒指不排除反制措施
·CCP is taking China towards more and more Owellian state
·中国公民社会前景:乐观还是堪忧?
·中共渗透遭美欧澳等国谴责 专家析世界格局
·Laogai, le goulag chinois
·不反思計劃生育 中國就沒有未來
·中国:溃败与希望
·Conversation on China’s human right
·Draconic Restrictions on Uyghur Cultural And Religious Freedoms
·寧添十座墳,不添一個人
· the only way seems to become more dictatorial and oppressiv
·不管藍營綠營,面對的都是「集中營
·惠台政策还是经济统战?
·专访:用李明哲案件恐吓整个台湾
·習近平進一步向毛澤
·中共專制政權威脅全世界
·新戊戌变法的变与不变
·【Documentary】China: Spies, Lies and Blackmail
·No escape: The fearful life of China's exiled dissidents
·中国异议人士逃抵西方仍难脱离中共监控威胁
·The State of Human Rights Lawyers in China
·权益组织:电视认罪—一场中国官方导演的大戏
·温良学者 正义卫士(一)
·Has Xi Jinping Changed China? Not Really
·訪滕彪律師談中共政權對於全世界民主自由人權發展的負面影響
·中共绑架中国
·美国务院发布人权报告 点名批评中国等八国
·滕彪,温良学者 正义卫士(二)——发出不同的声音
·鸿茅药酒:中共制度之毒
·on televised confessions
·滕彪,温良学者 正义卫士(三)——挑战恶法 虽败犹荣
·温良学者 正义卫士(四)——铁骨也柔情
·温良学者 正义卫士(五)——黑暗中的闪电
·美两党议员推法案 要求调查中共渗透/NTD
·Video【Teng Biao: From 1989 to 1984】
·第二届藏港台圆桌会 中国律师表态支持自决权
·自由民主與自決權:第二屆藏港台圓桌會議
·Exiled in the U.S., a Lawyer Warns of ‘China’s Long Arm’
·端传媒滕彪专访:一个曾经的依法维权者,怎么看今日中国?
·VOA:川金会上 人权问题真的被忽略了吗?
·“中国的长臂”:滕彪审视西方机构对华自我审查
·中国长臂迫使西方机构公司自我审查/RFA
·美退出人权理事会 滕彪呼吁应将人权与经贸利益挂钩
·“中国政治转变的可能前景”研讨会纪要
·滕彪:川普退出人权理事会是为人权?西藏、新疆民族自决
· The Second China human rights lawyers day
·第二届“中国人权律师节”将于7月8日在纽约举行
·【video】A message from a Chinese human rights lawyer
·【RFA中国热评】美中贸易战、 “七五”、“709案”
·回顾709案:中国迫害律师的第三波高潮
·中国人权律师节力赞人权律师的意义
·高智晟、王全璋获颁首届中国人权律师奖
·Chinese rights lawyers and international support
·高智晟王全璋纽约获人权律师奖 亲友代领
·709大抓捕三周年 境内外纷有声援行动/RFA
·Forced disappearances
·光荣的荆棘路——第二届中国人权律师节开幕短片(Openning film on the Sec
·用法律抗争与对法律宣战
·「709大抓捕」並非偶然…
·An Editor Speaks Out: Teng Biao, Darkness Before Dawn, and ABA
·中國假疫苗事件能夠杜絕?
·当局不解决人们提出的问题,而是〝解决〞提出问题的人们
·疫苗之殇还是贼喊捉贼/RFA
·The legal system is a battleground, and there’s no turning back
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Innocence project movement in China rises to aid the wrongfully convic

   http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/innocence_project_movement_in_china_rises_to_aid_the_wrongfully_convicted/
   
   
   POSTED DEC 01, 2015 02:30 AM CST
   


   BY ANTHONY LIN
   
   
   1
   
   China's death penalty train, widely believed to be the world's most active, is showing some signs of slowing down. And domestic innocence projects may be having an effect, though small, on getting wrongful convictions in capital crimes overturned.
   
   China may execute more people every year than the rest of the world combined. Amnesty International believes that to be the case—though it declines to estimate how many executions are carried out because it is pushing China to reveal the figure, currently a state secret. The Dui Hua Foundation, a San Francisco-based human rights group, reckons 2,400 people received the death penalty in China in 2013. That compares to 369 in Iran, the next-highest in executions, and 39 in the United States.
   
   Dui Hua estimates the 2013 figure was down 20 percent from 2012. The Chinese government is considering a reduction in the number of offenses eligible for capital punishment from 55 to 46. And innocence projects are arising to push for the exonerations of those who have been wrongfully convicted of capital crimes.
   
   SHOCK TO THE SYSTEM
   
   “This does seem to be a positive development,” says Amnesty International’s China researcher, Patrick Poon, who adds that “the Chinese government sees the global trend” away from capital punishment.
   
   Part of that trend has been recognizing the possibility of wrongful convictions. Ira Belkin, executive director of the U.S.-Asia Law Institute at New York University School of Law, says the Chinese criminal justice system was shocked to the core in 2005 and again in 2010, when people thought to be victims of two men convicted of murder turned up alive and well.
   
   “A system which had held itself out as more or less infallible and considered itself to be focused on substantive justice—as opposed to the Western preoccupation with procedural justice—all of a sudden was shown to be capable of making very fundamental substantive mistakes,” Belkin says. “The government responded by acknowledging the problem, enacting some new rules on excluding unlawfully obtained evidence, and created space for Chinese lawyers to propose ways to prevent and redress wrongful convictions.”
   
   Lawyers like Shandong-based Li Jinxing and Xu Xin, a professor at the Beijing Institute of Technology, began launching domestic innocence projects, modeled after the one started in the U.S. by Barry Scheck and Peter Neufeld in 1992, to try to overturn wrongful death penalty convictions. They have scored some notable successes, winning exonerations in 2014 for four men accused of bombing a Communist Party office, as well as a man accused of poisoning his neighbors. In both cases, the defendants claimed confessions were obtained through the use of torture.
   
   But making these cases is far from straightforward. Though China’s Supreme People’s Court can review death penalty cases, that power is completely discretionary. Poon says lawyers just send submission after submission to the courts, hoping something will eventually jar the court’s interest. They typically try to enlist the news media to help make their case, often by staging protests or publicity stunts.
   
   CORRUPTION REIGNS
   
   Teng Biao, a lawyer who founded China Against Death Penalty in 2010 and is now a visiting fellow with the U.S.-Asia Law Institute, says the rampant corruption and lack of judicial independence in the Chinese legal system are the biggest challenges. “In the United States, if the lawyer can provide powerful evidence, it’s more straightforward to convince judges to overturn a conviction,” he says. “But in China, the judges, prosecutors and police usually already know they are sentencing innocent citizens to death.”
   
   Teng says such sentences come about because Chinese law enforcement officials are under enormous pressure to deliver convictions. In high-profile cases, it may not be possible to apprehend the actual perpetrator within the desired time frame, so authorities arrest someone using flimsy or even fabricated evidence, then torture a confession out of that person. Given such circumstances, there’s little incentive to revisit these cases.
   
   And the official support for these efforts only goes so far. Indeed, the Chinese government has recently intensified its persecution of “rights lawyers,” who it more typically regards as troublemakers, arresting or detaining hundreds of them over the past few months. Those swept up have included a number of lawyers working on death penalty cases. Were he in China now, Teng says, he has little doubt he would be arrested.
   
   Belkin, who recently visited China with Scheck and met many rights lawyers, shakes his head at what’s been happening.
   
   “Using the law to protect the rights of citizens is the most civilized, socially harmonious way of addressing social justice issues,” he says. “Unfortunately, it involves somewhat of a bottom-up approach and inevitably involves a challenge to authority. The current administration seems to prefer a top-down approach and is not tolerant of challenges to its authority or decisions.”
   
   This article originally appeared in the December 2015 issue of the ABA Journal with this headline: “Change in China? Innocence project movement rises to aid the wrongfully convicted.”
(2015/12/23 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场